Conscious Thought and Problem Solving
Help Questions
AP Psychology › Conscious Thought and Problem Solving
How can making assumptions impede our abilities to solve problems?
By providing a filter for information that we may need
By causing us to be stereotypical thinkers
By making us less intelligent
By making us less open
None of these
Explanation
Making assumptions may make us skip over important information we may need to solve a problem. This can happen in a variety of problems, especially when they involve people. We carry around many preconceived notions about how people and our society work. If we have a problem understanding a certain phenomena in society, it may be due to these kinds of assumptions. For instance, patriarchal society once widely assumed that women were destined for housework and many people didn't understand why women were so happy. They attributed it to their "biology". Instead, it's better understood that women desire just as much as men to participate in and feel like they belong in their society.
Which of the following is an example of an arranging problem?
Making the letters NCDAENIG into DANCING
Identifying two rhymes (e.g. as "mom" and "bomb")
A mathematical addition problem
An algebraic formula
None of these
Explanation
Problems associated with arranging involve moving parts to fulfill a certain criterion. This manifests in many forms. Puzzles, anagrams, and block building are all forms of arrangement tasks. In the example provided in the answer, the letters are appropriately arranged to make the word “dancing.”
What is divergent thinking?
Creative thinking whereby one creates new and innovative solutions to problems
Stereotypical or prejudiced thinking
Illogical or emotionally motivated reasoning
Deviant or sadistic reasoning
None of these answers is accurate.
Explanation
Divergent thinking is when one thinks of new solutions to problems. It's how people innovate and address recurring issues with new solutions that may actually fix the problem. It is not stereotypical, sadistic, or emotional, and rather engages the creative thinking processes. An example of divergent thinking would be the development of electric cars in response to the air pollution problems.
Which of the following is an example of dialectical reasoning?
A politician viewing the pros and cons of a bill to decide whether or not it should be passed
A student following an algorithm to get the correct answer for a calculus problem
A person who reasons that since all tigers are felines and all felines are mammals all tigers must be mammals
A person who reasons that since every butterfly he/she has since has been orange, all butterflies must be orange
Forming a sub-goal in an analogy problem
Explanation
Dialectical reasoning involves going back and forth between opposing points of view in order to come up with a satisfactory solution. This involves fully engaging in each side of the problem. This could be as simple as a person making a pros and cons list for what trip they want to take or as complex as a politician considering all positive and negative consequences of a bill being passed.
Which of the following impedes problem solving abilities?
All of these
Functional fixedness
Mental set
Making assumptions
Irrelevant information
Explanation
Researchers have identified several mental obstacles to our problem solving/reasoning processes. Functional fixedness, mental set, and making assumptions, and irrelevant information are just some of many. Although their precise definitions won't be defined here, the commonality they share is a misdirection in focus and to an extent being stuck on what has worked in the past.
What is precognition?
Predicting future events
Thinking about the process of thinking
The processes that occur before thinking
The processes that occur during thinking
The processes that occur after thinking
Explanation
Precognition is a term that depicts the correct prediction of future events. For example, if a child predicts that a certain team will win her soccer league and that prediction occurs, then the child has exhibited precognition of this event.
What of the following is not a correct approach to problem solving?
None of these
Inductive reasoning
Deductive reasoning
Forming sub-goals
Dialectical reasoning
Explanation
There are many resources at our disposal to solve problems. We can use trial and error, algorithms, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, dialectical reasoning, heuristics, forming sub-goals, and similar problems to help us approach the problem at hand. No single one method is measurably better than the other but some are more appropriate for particular problems.
After watching several television programs about shark attacks, John starts to think that these attacks are relatively common and refuses to go into the water when visiting the beach due to his fear of shark attacks. Which of the following could be the cause of John’s overestimation of the prevalence of shark attacks?
Availability heuristic
Representativeness heuristic
Simulation heuristic
Sunk-costs fallacy
False-consensus effect
Explanation
The availability heuristic leads people to make decisions based on how available information is inside their brains. After recently watching shark-attack programs, this readily available information influenced John's judgments of the likelihood of shark attacks.
How can belief perseverance impede our ability to solve problems?
If we are trying to solve a problem, yet something truthful comes up that challenges our beliefs, due to belief perseverance we may not let go of our preconceived notions, and hence find the wrong solution.
We may acquire the wrong beliefs from consistently analyzing data improperly.
Despite there being many other solutions, we will choose the one we believe will make us the happiest, which may not be the best solution overall.
We have a tendency to believe the same thing over time since it is familiar and comfortable to us. Out of comfort, we may not let go of these beliefs throughout life.
Explanation
Belief perseverance is the distinct phenomenom in which we tend not to let go of our previous beliefs despite compelling or truthful evidence that contradicts them. For instance, we may believe that our spouse is faithful, but then find compelling evidence that contradict this. In spite of the evidence, we may continue to believe our spouse is faithful out of our inability to let go of our beliefs. Instead of confronting the problem, due to belief preserverance, we keep believing what makes us comfortable.
How can irrelevant information impede problem solving abilities?
By distracting a person from important information
By making a person focus on important information
By overwhelming a person with too much stimuli
None of these
Explanation
When a person is presented with a problem this problem may be presented with irrelevant information. That is, this information will not be useful when coming up with a solution. This is a common device used in riddles. Teasing out irrelevant information entails figuring out what precisely is being asked of you for the solution.